gypsies

There is a big disinclination toward Romanians in western Europe, probably because the mismatch with gypsies.

Singling out 'religion' as somehow a differentiating factor is like trying to differentiate between Hitler's eradication of gypsies and homosexuals.

It serves no purpose other than raising the suspicion that one particularly hates gypsies or homosexuals.

Blatant racism against gypsies an arabs spread like wildfire on Facebook in sweden this way.

They are different cultures...the same as gypsies and poorer social ranks from post-soviet countries.

It's sort of a fine balance - we can't have everybody on tv making fun of gypsies and mexicans.

Something like, you know, gypsies are to Romanians what latinos are to US.

Trondheim ended with a huge group of gypsies a few years back.

I'm a little confused by your comment as you seem to be implying that a gypsy is a bad thing and it's thus offensive to the drivers to be called gypsies.

You'd march to your CO's office, and form a union, and then lobby the politicians for stricter sentencing and a more broad classification of gypsies, possibly.

Why don't you blame them as easily as the gypsies?

I'm pretty tired, as a romanian myself, of always pointing out how good we are at math and that NO, we're not gypsies.

He was insinuating that Uber's innovation was cheap workers and then slurring these as "gypsies".

I don't understand your point about gypsies; "gypsy cab" is a pretty widely understood term for an illegal, unlicensed cab.

Camps would be even better at holding soldiers if a few planes bombed them, and some millions of Jews/Poles/Russians/Gypsies/Ukrainians/Muslims/Homosexualists, and other "subhumans" would be free.

And by innovation, he probably doesn't refer to the slur that you did by calling their workforce "gypsies" but to the resource locality problem solved by an app.

That was as an answer to your original description of Guantanamo as equally shocking as the mass murders of Jews/Gypsies in WW II.

> That was as an answer to your original description of Guantanamo as of an equal shocking standard as the mass murders of Jews/Gypsies in WW II.

Would you have argued that absent provocation the Allied powers should have done nothing to stop Nazi persecution of Jews, Gypsies, and homosexuals because (and this was true) no nation was willing to take in the refugees?