watchmaker

Without all the pieces the watchmaker is just some guy with the knowledge to make watches.

Its about the perceived quality of the watchmaker/the insides for most people who buy luxury brands watches.

Almost like an old school watchmaker...a million ways to do the same end result.

Should we stick to hand-crafted silicon chips, painstakingly etched by a former Swiss watchmaker full of compassion?

So...no, the Swiss watchmaker won't, on the whole, survive the digital age.

I've even spent a little time with apps like Facer and Watchmaker and some Photoshop/Illustrator to make my own faces.

Every watchmaker has always had a hard time selling women's watches.

Most people go to a watchmaker to change them.

Without a watchmaker, the pieces are all just pieces.

Which watchmaker do you go to for your watch?

If this stuff interests you and you haven't read the blind watchmaker yet then find a copy somewhere, it has a chapter on clay that is quite interesting.

How come there is no 'watchmaker' situation here?

Richard Dawkins paints a similar picture in "The Blind Watchmaker".

Dawkins' book "the Blind Watchmaker" introduced "biomorphs".

"Blind Lego Watchmaker" - lego biomorphs.

(see The Blind Watchmaker, "This means that the light, instead of being granted an unrestricted passage to the photocells, has to pass through a forest of connecting wires, presumably suffering at least some attenuation and distortion (actually probably not much but, still, it is the principle of the thing that would offend any tidy-minded engineer)".

Blind Watchmaker), are quite a good and gentle introduction.

In his 1986 book, The Blind Watchmaker, Dawkins comments: Any engineer would naturally assume that the photocells would point towards the light, with their wires leading backwards towards the brain.