ventana

In the mean time, I'm sure those Ventana engineers can also help them improve their ARM designs, too.

Parker/Ventana violated their rules, so the CCC sent a Cease and Desist, and they settled with Parker paying fines and Ventana agreeing to restore the area a bit.

I had heard that Ventana had a lot of people that were laid off from Intel for instance.

And why did Qualcomm pay all that money for Ventana recently?

I can't imagine that all the Tenstorrent and Ventana and so forth people doing massively OoO 8-wide cores won't also have fast misaligned accesses.

* Ventana - They claim to have a high performance core design that is 15-wide.

I quite like what Ventana does with the Veyron V2/V3.

> And why did Qualcomm pay all that money for Ventana recently?

Frankly, Ventana seemed like an interesting entry in the space, but I have no idea who would have actually bought their servers at the end of the day.

And that includes all the design Verification tools/EDA tools that Ventana developed for their specific CPU core designs and all that non hardware stuff that takes a larger investment in dollars than just the hardware's development alone costs!

I think Ventana (formerly Bioimagene) also used to ship Barco displays with their Virtuoso package[2] Nobody says that the display vendors have been successful with this marketing so far; the people I've worked with are also not buying these things.

About the translation, sure, "boot" ≈ "iniciar", "window" = "ventana", but for (microsoft) windows, and other names in foreign languages, the same name must be kept.

Pretty much everything coming out in 2026 -- including Ventana's Veyron V2 -- is RVA23.

That's why I think this is probably an aquihire more than a desire to ship Ventana's CPU cores.

Fully agree - Ventana's cores are more like Cortex A76 kinds of things, and are on a completely different scale from typical Cortex-M cores.