Trophic used in a sentence

Trophic in a sentence as an adjective

It also suggests that there is a problem in a lower trophic level. We've read a lot about insect die offs.

They weren’t hugely aware of the threat that things like climate change, or trophic cascades, could present. They were pure hypotheticals.

You'll need to move entire reliable trophic chains, and humans are only the cherry at the top. So take with you some rotifers, some Chlorella also and...

The idea that I take away from the video is less one of trophic cascade and more of the connectedness of things in biology.

Having people eat the soy directly instead of feeding it to cattle yields massive efficiency gains by removing an entire trophic level.

The trophic cascade is a manifestation of the connectedness of all things biological.

Playing with floridian ecosystems and trophic chains at large scale. If you really want to do this kind of experiments you need to assure that it happens in the context of an stable, responsible government.

The trophic level of animals in the food chain necessitates that they will eat more calories of plant matter than would provide calories of food upon being eaten. Secondly, you should look at the sorts of plants being consumed and where they fall in the plant's life cycle.

Because the trophic levels form a pyramid of sorts, competing really only makes sense as the dominant strategy in the top layer or two where usable resources really are extremely scarce. But 99% of organisms don't fall into that category."

The trophic level of animals in the food chain necessitates that they will eat more calories of plant matter than would provide calories of food upon being eaten. To put this into more laymen's terms, meat cultivation dramatically increases the total amount of plants that we need to grow.

Look up bottom-up trophic cascade. >Without them, humans would have to go hunt which is additional labor. Not necessarily. Bottom-up trophic cascade takes care of that.

Animals are above plants trophic-level-wise, and their feed conversion efficiency can't be more than 100%. That said, insects are way more efficient than mammals at converting plants into human-edible calories thanks in part to their lack of internal temperature control and growth rate.

But one leaking barrel of DDT will affect an ecosystem for far longer than one leaking barrel of Sarin, and do more damage where it hurts the ecosystem the most by accumulating as it creeps up the trophic pyramid.

It’s the classic example of what’s called a “trophic cascade,” and has appeared in textbooks, on National Geographic centerfolds and in this newspaper. Americans may know this story better than any other from ecology, and its grip on our imagination is one of the field’s proudest contributions to wildlife conservation.

There is considerable selective pressure upon the spike protien, very large changes to this protien are not frequently viable, as the virus would need to find a new trophic target or a new host altogether. We are tracking these changes closely and concommitantly can change the sequence of mRNA, responsively, and pre-emptively if desired.

Quote Examples using Trophic

>Not all food chains are controlled by bottom-up trophic cascade. And where did I imply that it is? >some are controlled by apex predators and removing apex predators changes the ecosystem, sometimes in ways that result in collapse. Not really. The very same ecosystem can adapt to changes in predator population or extermination of predator population altogether. >You're shifting your explanation. Earlier you said that humans could replace apex predators. When I pointed out the problems with that, now you say it can be controlled with bottom up trophic cascade.

Anonymous

Look up bottom-up trophic cascade. The existence of other ways of controlling population doesn't mean that those other ways are the only way. Not all food chains are controlled by bottom-up trophic cascade. some are controlled by apex predators and removing apex predators changes the ecosystem, sometimes in ways that result in collapse. > Not necessarily. Bottom-up trophic cascade takes care of that. You're shifting your explanation. Earlier you said that humans could replace apex predators. When I pointed out the problems with that, now you say it can be controlled with bottom up trophic cascade.

Anonymous