table-based

The LFG is used when setting up the map, while the table-based is used for enemy AI during gameplay.

And a table-based layout, and the navigation is a single image with maps.

But table-based layouts are fine, and sometimes the only was to achieve a desired effect.

Layouts were table-based and yes, styles were almost always in-line and not in separate stylesheets.

It seems some people have misunderstood the recommendation against using <table>-element for layout, and thinks there is something wrong with table-based layouts.

I noticed recently that it doesn't seem to combat the worst offenders: sites using width= attributes or invisible-table-based margins.

You could achieve much the same stuff, pixel-per-pixel, back with table-based layout.

I am also working on a table-based view and all of my rows show up blue.

I like to read HN from my phone, but the table-based layout just doesn't work.

Speaking as someone who has implemented both table-based layout and CSS 2.1, it's really unfortunate to see people want to return to the bad old world.

This table-based layout has been in place since 2007, and I don't believe there have been any efforts by the owners to update it.

Honestly I can't say that modern html with its clutter of div and span tags is really any more readable than old style table-based layout.

The LFG still exists, but now a "table-based RND generator" also appears.