Substructure used in a sentence

Substructure in a sentence as a noun

I love the hidden substructure of trivia like this.

This only works for immutable strings which never share substructure, though.

For example, given 20 molecules, find the largest substructure which is in at least 15 of them.

"But that wasn't what the article is about at all, it was asking the question why is all the substructure re-invented every time?

Probably consisting of two teams of civil engineers; one for superstructure and one for substructure.

If "isomorphic" means "in bijection with" and "substructure" means "subset" then this is cardinality.

The derivative is the one-hole context, but the zipper is more like a one-substructure context instead.

Perhaps the length of the component that must be understood on it's own. Imagine a multi-line paragraph which meant something different to its literal interpretation, but only if those exact words were used, and the meaning did not transfer if you replaced some of the grammatical substructure.

His method for substructure isomorphism is hand-waving optimism, for example.

Even where non-parking substructure is built, it usually still requires a complete excavation to ensure that the materials are appropriate for keeping a skyscraper from falling over.

Working with sets: "bigger" usually means "larger cardinality" but could sometimes mean "proper superset".In general, you can take "X is bigger than Y" to mean "Y is isomorphic to some substructure of X, but not vice versa".

Cool idea... but doing some back-of-the-envelope calcs on this, I get:Yield, assuming 3 harvests/year = ~ 24,000 l ethanol per yearPrice of ethanol =~ $1/l... if feedstock = 50% of price, then value of beet grown = ~ $12,000/yearNeglecting all running and maintenance costs,to get a 6% return you'd need to cover your hectare with conveyor belt for $200,000... that's $20/m2, inc substructure.

I don't know, but maybe his thoughts went along the line of "primes are some substructure of the natural numbers and such and such changes happen in the functions that we can build on them".So he was obviously able to speak about some collection of primes, yet whether an actual number is prime he probably doesn't think much about.