substantiated

I don't disagree that Mozilla was never a purist organization, but I think the suggestion is well substantiated.

Your opinion is not substantiated by any significant amount of evidence and therefore does not merit consideration.

The idea that the terrible outcome is proof positive of anything in particular is not well substantiated.

As substantiated by another thread, this is a very very poor data visualisation that is being inflicted upon us.

As such they're subject to a similar environment that attracts shady characters and enables weakly substantiated claims.

You don't get to make fallaciously substantiated conjectures and then demand everyone believe them until the core claim is disproven.

The overwhelming majority of people are going to type it properly, as substantiated by my failed login stats (less than 1%).

Until statistics can be presented that have substantiated backing, this is an unfair assessment.

Others will be curious to find out whether these claims can be substantiated.

It's unclear: the article makes claims that can't be substantiated: * The legal documents don't mention any payment (required or otherwise) to EFF.

The connection between a high carbohydrate diet and metabolic syndrome is well substantiated.

If it turned out the ad couldn't be substantiated, but the practices described in the article were accurate, it'd be worthy of a correction.

Is this substantiated or another "vaccines cause autism" kind of thing?

Furthermore, I think when one claims something is "substantiated", one should come with strong evidence.

I think that claim is sufficiently substantiated that it ought not be called an "assumption."