sub-molecular

Unfortunately, to get molecular and sub-molecular resolution on single molecules you have be pretty close to the target (nanometers/Angstroms).

This includes large scale simulations of all kinds, including fluids, particle systems, molecular and sub-molecular simulations.

I'm sure many of the early discoveries regarding the sub-molecular structure of matter seemed pretty abstract at first.

A mass misbelief in the continuation of Moore's law into impossible sub-molecular scales.

More and more we're able to handle things at the sub-molecular level, so it's probable that soon we'll have spare organs.

As we swap around at the sub-molecular level, in water we end up maybe getting diffuse bubbles of hydrogen peroxide, oxygen, or hydrogen gasses.

Predicting the actual dynamic behavior of the brain would require some super-super sub-molecular level scan and then correctly simulating that, since what the neurons will actually do depends on much more than the basic wiring.

We can swap lots of ever-finer sections of the water or inert gas around within the enclosing box and not notice much difference, until we get down to the sub-molecular level.

I don't completely understand what you are saying; the information encoded at the nucleic level does not have any analogy at the sub-molecular level (IE there is no biological information stored using subatomic particles or quantum tricks), nor do there seem to be any functional contributes to non-information molecular mechanisms.

"Solid" doesn't really have meaning at the sub-molecular level.