senators

Also, note that my point - that auto makers mostly ignored Miller and Valasek, according to the article - would not include senators (unless said senators build cars, of course).

Even in a democratic society, would like to have the same senators or mayor for 500 hundreds years?

You mean like spying on our own senators [1]?

Each state gets a number of electoral vote that matches the number of Representatives and Senators in their state.

We puff our chests and Washington goes into a fury with Senators posturing all over the place.

Supreme Court (William Rehnquist at this time) was sworn in to preside, and the senators were sworn in as jurors.

You could instead: * lobby your congressperson and senators to start a federal reporting program.

The rule was shot down and the SEC was threatened with losing their funding if they did this by some 50 senators.

There are dozens more automakers and 98 more senators to convince.

Is this whole category of law a place where the DoJ has intercepted enough sketchy conversations that they've got leverage against key Senators and Reps?

> Also, note that my point - that auto makers mostly ignored Miller and Valasek, according to the article - would not include senators (unless said senators build cars, of course).

I'm sure the environmental lobby and a few senators looking to score some points with their constituents can take care of the rest.

For example, if a senator wrote an article saying senators' salaries should be increased, one could respond: "Of course he would say that.

However, if someone starts selling ready-to-go Hackintoshes direct to customers under the brand name “Apple Mac”, Apple legal is going to come down on them like a ton of bricks, sic the FTC on them, get some senators involved, or whatever it takes.

Senators may not build cars, but they can (and are trying to) force auto makers to take security seriously.

People disapprove of Congress as a whole, but tend to like their individual Representatives and Senators.