revisionism

It seems that every retelling of the great NS/MS browser war seems to be laden with historical revisionism.

It's huge revisionism to say that the 9-11 attacks were an attempt to destroy America by wasting resources.

One reason why holocaust revisionism is so popular is because of laws.

To insinuate that they were pro open source on video is revisionism.

It's like these companies just woke up suddenly, had a conference call and without a hint of discussion, analysis or feedback started enforcing moral revisionism.

To say that Typescript influenced Javascript in anyway in revisionism(i.e.

In that context some ego-stroking historical revisionism shouldn't be surprising.

The revisionism happened almost immediately after war ended.

That's part of the Lost Cause historical revisionism.

As a thought experiment, I'm going to throw out the worst possible analogy I can think of: How should historians deal with holocaust revisionism?

Too much revisionism and propaganda for my taste.

There's more than a bit of revisionism here.

Blast “the American Nation”, this is pure revisionism.

"t's a bit of historical revisionism to suggest that slavery wasn't the main driving cause of the rebellion" It's also revisionist history that Lincoln cared about slaves' rights.

Also, a prediction that 'X will push the economy in the wrong direction' is not directly contradicted by the economy going in the right direction in the presence of X; it's evidence against the relation, but not necessarily strong evidence in a complex system with many other factors - yet Murphy uses words like "revisionism" and "withering and irrefutable criticism".