relevancy

But the relevancy is to the title and summary.

But you guys said it was all about relevancy, the user, do no evil, etc.

First, a headline relevancy rant: the headline here is both vague and misleading.

Yeah, an ancient fork of Litecoin with a meme name is going to save us. Has absolutely no relevancy to the issue at hand of course.

So if this was focused on relevancy wouldn't the Ferrari link be to Ferrari's home page?

Matt Cutts should make some video like: "Google uses over 200 different signals to determine page relevancy.

To bring this back to HN relevancy, consider how to get on top of this problem at a corporate/startup level.

You're right, she totally should have "battled for relevancy" despite being called a "slut" and a "whore" while the CEO does nothing about it. Obviously, she just wasn't trying hard enough.

The "relevancy" of the questions to the day-to-day work is immaterial.

But I can't help but feel that the pendulum swung too far and too fast away from relevancy for too long and we've lost generations of would be art supporters.

I'm addressing the big three issues - context, relevancy, and surfacing - with a strong commitment to both readers and publishers.

Maybe this is a misconception on my part, but isn't local search listings and map info a form of organic search, just derived using different signals for authoritativeness and relevancy, of which proximity is only one variable?If the above is true, Google is dedicating way more real estate to organic than ever.