recordings

The market is absolutely tiny, and full of incumbents with control over the recordings.

For example, if your inputs are images or audio recordings, Just wanted to add: and word/character/phrase embeddings.

But one can learn to distinguish oneself from ones default thoughts, which are just recordings that get cued up by triggers.

Besides, good-quality classical recordings are cheap and widely available in a wide variety of formats.

It's just that most people don't have authorized audio/video recordings of these kinds of interactions.

Even in clear-cut cases with recordings, such as the Eric Garner incident, it does not seem to lead to real justice.

The killer app in this space will be when someone figures out how to extract a vocal model from existing recordings of singers.

Viewing magnetic recordings with magnetic particles used to be a standard maintenance tool.

Might be possible with text-to-speech engines based on pure synthesis (like eSpeak) rather than concatenation of actual voice recordings (every mainstream text-to-speech engine).

I have a few recordings where I can hear breathing and the clicking keys and valves.

For the most part there will be more performances for a given work than all the recordings a single orchestra can record in it's life time.

Nor is Classic FM, which is pretty much just Spotify with DJ chat and someone else's playlist, and is a good gateway pusher to classical recordings.

However, recordings do not have algorithmic behaviors; a "bug" in a recording has only an esthetic consequence.

Search "Gustav Mahler" and you get all of the recordings of his work, regardless of the orchestra or if it's in a compilation with other composers.

I think the $10K, 20 kilogram turntables and whatnot are overkill, but digital recordings can suffer in part because many of the players, while "digitally perfect" nonetheless do a crappy, cheap job of generating the final analog output.