Ratification used in a sentence

Ratification in a sentence as a noun

The deal was brought to them by the CEO for ratification. It will be subject to extensive due diligence, like any deal such as this is.

To do so would be a de facto admission that it requires Senate ratification. Instead words like "accord" and "agreement" are bandied about to dodge due process.

Remember, this is less than decade after ratification.

The word "regulate" was interpreted in more or less its modern sense in Gibbons v Ogden, in 1824, merely 35 years after ratification." [T]he power to regulate; that is, to prescribe the rule by which commerce is to be governed.

It hasn't been all peaceful, all the time, after ratification, but it should be in my opinion. We've managed to achieve so much as a nation with non-violent resistance and protest, there's no reason not to do that here to push for transparency.

National parliament ratification is also not a mere formality. The EU cannot afford to be divided at this moment, or have the mood in member states turned against it even more.

Even as far back as the ratification of the Constitution, these tensions existed. Twenty years prior, in the 1770s, there were already known and notable movements to abolish slavery in the colonies.

So the delegates wrote a new Constitution anyway, and specified a ratification threshold of 9 states. Once this threshold had been reached, the other 4 states could have fun governing their rump country under the old Articles.

Immediately following the ratification of the Constitution, states largely restricted voting rights to landholding white men. But by the 1840s most states had extended the right to vote to almost all white men, having done away with the requirement to own land, or pay taxes.

Chrome is far more worrying, especially with things like NaCl, store front and various far future standards being implemented without proper consultation and ratification with othe vendors.

The anti-federalists insisted upon a bill of rights as a condition to ratification. I would assert that most of the bill of rights is about protecting the ability to of the people revolt against the government: First Amendment - freedom of speech, freedom of assembly.

The most analogous historical precedent we have is prohibition, and iirc state laws didn't change until after the ratification of the 21st amendment, so that doesn't really apply. Unless you're saying that states would pass a constitutional amendment, which seems a little far fetched to me, though not impossible.

If negotiations out of the spotlight increase the parties' willingness to conclude a more limited and offer that for ratification, I'm willing to put up with it. Most of you here seem to be assuming that this is the result of corporate secrecy; it seems as likely, if not more, so, to be at the request of the various countries involved in the negotiations.

And remaining royalty free is essential to the very concept of the World Wide Web. Developing a new royalty-free standard would only invite participants to try to include as many encumbered concepts as possible to derail the royalty-free aspect, or to delay ratification and implementation for as long as possible to preserve the revenue from their royalty-bearing codecs. Having a standard that is designed by committee should not be an end in itself, but only a means to an end, and if other means are more expedient, then the other means should be used.

From the abstract, it is more likely that the mass of laws and policies that followed the ratification of the 18 amendment included an understanding that industrial alcohol should be exempt but rendered purposely undrinkable - which it already was. I am personally against prohibition, and against the government attempting to mandate morality;\nbut I fear that this article is popular because of its anti-government attitudes - but you could only come to the conclusion that there was ever a "Federal Poisoning Program" if you give perfect foresight agency to every policy the government passes...