quantification

It would be interesting to attempt a formal quantification of vandalism received by different projects susceptible to it.

Well, not spreadsheets per se, but their ability to ease quantification of certain money streams above others.

The links were provided because these discussions contains arguments (good and bad), it was not about quantification.

There doesn't have to be an objectively agreed on method for risk quantification to be useful.

The suggestion that risk quantification is absent from information security is completely alien to me.

IMO that's definitely a cop-out explanation, and per usual, there is not any actual quantification.

It is true that there is no objectively agreed on method for risk quantification.

The other thing that prevents useful quantification is that we don't have a Gaussian distribution to be seen.

Most people have a hard time committing to long-term work for self-quantification.

I may be missing it, but the cool thing about self-quantification usually is that you're not responsible for data acquisition.

Later typing systems were developed which correspond to logic with quantification.

Dark matter isn't a solution, it's a quantification of the unknown.

Nor how anyone would need this pseudo-quantification to undertstand that "fighting dietary deficiencies and heavy element poisoning" is important "if you care about helping countries develop".

"because there is virtually no quantifications of risks in anything I've read on the results of security research" Nearly all results of security research are given at least some metric for risk quantification.