Qualitative used in a sentence

Qualitative in a sentence as an adjective

If and when they drop behind again, they'll be back to talking about more qualitative aspects.

Oddly, when I ask them why, the answers are mostly qualitative. It has nothing to do with "reaching the most people" or "getting exposure".

There was a qualitative change after the banks went public. The old partnerships were inherently more prudent.

It's more like what git did with quick access to diffs: a quantitative change can become a qualitative change. Change the cost-benefit of toolsmithing, and you can use it in new ways.

She claimed to be doing only qualitative work, but what she got was just plain garbage. Another famous example is the Literary Digest "poll".

It stresses the plot is qualitative: a general shape of curves might be right and numbers might have correct order of magnitude nothing more.

There's a big difference between 1% and 10%, both qualitative and quantitative. For example: Smaller numbers are closer to the noise level, and therefore more subject to fluctuation.

Of course, the past often does predict the future -- yet, we can't bank on it, because there are sometimes qualitative shifts, and exceptions. The problem with hoping that technology will solve climate change before it happens, is that we're gambling something we can't afford to lose.

Reducing regulation would not change this essential qualitative difference.

This explains how moving from buttons and sensors to a touch-sensitive experience is a major and hard-to-explain qualitative difference. It also underscores the great point made here, that we can make devices far more suited still to the primary way we're designed to interact with the world.

Whether or not the reason for their dislike is fallacious, a qualitative difference in an implicit or explicit agreement will affect the community experience, and will anger those who were happy under the previous arrangement. 2.

Personal stories can be interesting and insightful; it's just that, in most discussion threads, HN tends to balance opinion with links to more objective qualitative and quantitative sources. That's what differentiates HN from sites like Facebook and Reddit.

Nobody wants to be told that their programming style relies on "error correction" to be parsed, but it's just an implementation detail of the parser, not some kind of qualitative statement about your programming skills. Changing the name does not change how the parser works, and does not make anyone involved a better or worse programmer.

As to why some people apparently feel more comfortable saying "stolen" in this case versus people sharing MP3s: There's an obvious qualitative difference between people sharing files, and someone passing work off as their own, especially when profiting from it. From what I can tell, it's the whole plagiarism part that really pisses people off.

Well, for one thing, there is sensitivity to placebo effects, because have purely qualitative phenomena that are being reported only subjectively. But even stronger is a selection bias that has to do with people's behavior in reporting and reading.

I'm not saying you're wrong, exactly, because there are qualitative differences. Manipulating syntax is definitely more powerful, and enables some truly crazy and wonderful constructs.

No, this kind of analysis gives you qualitative features of your data, and after all the topology is done there's still years of work before you arrive at a mathematical model that admits an algorithm that has accuracy comparable to the state of the art. An interesting case study in this is Carlsson's work on texture classification.

You can be very sure those folks were both willing and able to apply the qualitative judgments of risk unavailable to a policy driven review. Those partnerships were converted to publicly held equity because this was less risky for those partners and allowed the companies to achieve larger scale, momentarily conveying cost advantages.

Edit: The difference actually springs from a qualitative difference in the search. In the case of a lone person, the government is seeking information about that person in a vacuum; in the case of hoovering up millions of records, they're explicitly looking for interconnections, which is different in kind than if they were looking at each record in isolation, and just happened to have millions.

I'm saying that research conclusions based on quantitative data, no less than those based on qualitative information, are subject to debate and argument, not physical objective material reality simply because there were measurements and numbers involved.

You can't just wave the problem away by declaring it's just a quantitative change, because it's a big enough quantitative change to become a qualitative change. In fact, quantitative changes that become qualitative changes by being large enough are the entire reason we're having this discussion in the first place! It's perfectly possible to **** a person with just your hands." All" a gun does is make it easier... but trying to dismiss all of the legal and moral questions around guns by claiming that it's only a difference of degree, not kind, isn't going to convince very many people. A big enough quantitative change is a qualitative change.

There is a qualitative difference between "being in public" and "being recorded while in public" and "being recorded in public over an extended period of time." You take a picture on the beach and catch me in the frame, I'm totally fine with that, you take pictures of that beach every day for a year and then put IDs on every 'face' so that you've got a history of everyone who has been to the beach, I'm much less comfortable with that, you create an API so that someone can send you a picture of a face and you will give them the history of that face at the beach for the last 12 months, I've got a huge problem with that.

Proper Noun Examples for Qualitative

Qualitative is, I guess, the word... but they blew it.