proscription

I'm not sure this is a bad thing mind you, but depending on your arguments you may well arrive at a similar proscription.

I think this explains my reaction to python every time I'm forced to use or maintain it -- there's no fun in the language, just proscription.

The only thing unusual I see here is printing this kind of label on the package and also the proscription against growing from seed.

The actual advice they meant to give is something along the lines of, "Don't be vague about agency," but that is a different proscription.

That sort of proscription reminds me of warnings against global state in procedural programs, and shared state in parallel programs.

He argues for overturning the deeply held—and, in his view, irrational—proscription against two-foot driving.

But the proscription against adverbs is a stylistic rule, not a grammatical one. Arguing descriptive vs prescriptive on a rule of style doesn't make much sense to me; isn't the point of style rules to be prescriptive?Other than that, I largely agree with your broader points.

My torts casebook quotes cases going back to the 14th century, and perjury and frameups were enough of a problem in ancient Babylon to be subject to legal proscription.

This behavior violates their own proscription against manipulating drives with hybrid MBRs.

Should you expend time enumerating and assigning probabilistic weights to all the good and evil that could come from it?Far simpler proscription: as a human using a tool, don't do evil with the tool.

It's inherently an "organic"/meat-puppet power - as it is implied it's tied to forebears and progeny...And finally, as noted, there is a deeply held proscription against "thinking machines" due to an... event.

That's not a proscription of adventure so much as an acknowledgement that the whole nature of adventure is disruptive: multiple variables in your equation are changing at rapid rates, and they are important variables: food, shelter, language, currency.

"History and politics and sociology classes are not...""its already just a piece of paper...""You won't be permitted to change anything...""if voting could change anything it would be outlawed...""You'll be given...""This is the stage...""The purpose of a democracy is...""its a blueprint..."A litany of declarative bromides, delivered with pseudo-authority and strung together without forming a coherent thought, call to action or proscription for remedy.

The basic Keynesian proscription for reviving a moribund economy is to put idle resources to work through more government investment, and for many years economists have tried to figure out which investments offer the best bang for the buck by measuring fiscal multipliers, etc. But this approach assumes that a dollar of output is a dollar of output, when in reality—if we're doing economics, and not mere accounting—people often value a dollar's worth of one good very differently from a dollar's worth of another.