prejudiced

That kind of environment leads to a lot of prejudiced thinking.

I have never felt like I was treated in a prejudiced manner by a white person that I know.

It's solved by honest people trying really hard not to be prejudiced, because prejudice is innate.

My prejudiced view of asians as people that know how to build websites has totally been challenged.

Had the public not been so prejudiced, the government could have kept their genius employed, and alive.

There is ample evidence that women and black people are seen as less capable, even by people who have no desire to be prejudiced.

The US electoral process is prejudiced against any candidate with skills other than "people skills.

I am not prejudiced against new things, and while CoffeeScript doesn't seem like a worthwhile idea to me, it's community is far more offensive.

Even if an individual was prejudiced against someone because they are white, they would not be affected outside of that one interaction.

This willful blindness to bias and prejudice because smart people are not biased or prejudiced prevents us from examining our thoughts and behavior.

> On the other hand startup CEOs tends to be prejudiced against developers who work for less cutting-edge large companies like Dell, Accenture, or Salesforce.

Its a good thing I stopped working for other people, because I feel sorry for anyone who tries to interview me with these prejudiced questions:Q: What's your github id?A: Tell you what, tell me yours and I'll criticize your project and language choices.

It's not just that they've completely prejudiced the question, by forcing it down one particular design path, it's that they've made it clear this is not a test of my ability to design systems, it's a test of my ability to mimic their design of the system.

I am prejudiced against people who use their real names when the website allows them to use a nickname: I automatically assume they will be uninteresting, their opinions sheepish and will always avoid confrontation or controversial ideas.

The absence of live testimony and the absence of discovery are particularly limiting in this context - if you can't find out too much about what the adverse party is going to claim and if you can't get your hands on evidence he holds to rebut it, you may be severely prejudiced.