Phrasing used in a sentence

Phrasing in a sentence as a noun

As that phrasing implies, I don't think this is going to be an easy process. The purpose of a speed limit is not to make people not go more than 55 miles per hour.

Some people call it "customer-driven development" and I think that's a good way of phrasing it.

Even when the author is attempting to question this basic premise it still warps his phrasing. Why is it terrible?

I don't have any problem with that; I've sometimes even gone as far as phrasing it as, "If you don't hate your tech stack, you aren't really using it." I can tell you all kinds of things that C#, the .

The current accepted standard of phrasing in business circles eliminates the subject and would read "would love to grab a coffee". Would love to hear your thoughts on this space.

All in all, it was a deft response to a situation where someone else may easily have caused offence with inconsiderate phrasing. Not a big deal in its own right, but small moments like that stack up.

Edit: I've tempered my phrasing above quite a bit and removed references to individuals.

The message I got from his body language, nuance, and phrasing was something like "Obviously people who are elected from heavy technology areas are feeling a lot of heat. There's still a lot of support, though.

That phrasing was deliberate and different to treating college as some kind of vocational processing plant. It means if you spend 8 years studying history at top schools and rack up $200,000 in debt then you probably made some bad choices.

Pr/i/SDS It's also funny that the phrasing "no obligation to buy" is all over the place. When in fact obligation is legally defined in the civil sense as a contractual compelling promise for a course of action.

The cited article contains phrasing that is designed to be misleading. It says for example, "Seven previous studies had already shown that vitamins increased the risk of cancer and heart disease and shortened lives.

The actual phrasing is "antiquated style of process isolation", which leads me to believe that he's not saying that process isolation is inherently antiquated, but that the way Chrome does it is. In that case, it still needs some explanation.

I'd also like to clarify that nobody's accounts were threatened: in every case my phrasing was as follows: 'I hope you can understand our position and can agree to remove the Dropship code'.

Even the phrasing smells like something you'd read on Tumblr or a r/shitredditsays comment thread. I don't think I can make a strong inference about what actually happened, but I would not treat this whole kerfuffle as a useful source of information about gender issues in technology--except that this is another example how powerful accusations concerning touchy issues can be, even when there is "no evidence" for them.