palaeontologist

Maybe if you want to be a palaeontologist actually use scientific language rather than non-scientific judgements.

The authors could have talked to a geologist or palaeontologist, which would've saved them the time spent on writing a speculative paper like this.

Not any kind of palaeontologist but I do like dinosaurs like any sensible person.

As a palaeontologist, I rate him because Harvard did.

He fronted a parliamentary hearing on climate change some time around 2010, where a heroic Liberal minister stated something along the lines of ‘you’re a palaeontologist, not a climate scientist, so you’re argument is invalid’.

The fact that a palaeontologist could see a pile of fossilized “chalk bits” and draw the conclusion that it’s 66M year old fish vomit is mind boggling.

As a Hebrew speaking palaeontologist, I would get confused about “golem” or “Stegosaurus”.

Calling on biblical prophecies, he wrote: “This day will be divine, awesome, but not miraculous, for resurrection will be a task not of miracle but of knowledge and common labour.” This theory was carried into the 20th century by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, a French Jesuit priest and palaeontologist who, like Fedorov, believed that evolution would lead to the Kingdom of God.

The fact that a palaeontologist could see a pile of fossilized “chalk bits” and draw the conclusion that it’s 66M year old fish vomit is mind boggling.

As a Hebrew speaking palaeontologist, I would get confused about “golem” or “Stegosaurus”.

Calling on biblical prophecies, he wrote: “This day will be divine, awesome, but not miraculous, for resurrection will be a task not of miracle but of knowledge and common labour.” This theory was carried into the 20th century by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, a French Jesuit priest and palaeontologist who, like Fedorov, believed that evolution would lead to the Kingdom of God.