obliquity

Which is because the earths axial tilt is that angle: Earth's mean obliquity is currently 23°26′12.2″ (or 23.43672°) and decreasing.

Kay uses ICI which was a leading pharma company in the UK to explain obliquity in business.

Perihelion is not a concept related to the obliquity of the earth or the axial precession.

As an extreme case, imagine a tidally locked planet on a circular orbit of 1 AU with 23.5 degree obliquity.

As such, once you've invoked perihelion, you can't attribute responsibility to obliquity or precession.

Wouldn’t the simpler (and safe) solution be to reduce Earth's obliquity to zero?

Theory of Obliquity by Prof John Kay at Oxford is really interesting.

The length of the solar day is not constant, for two primary reasons (non-circularity of Earth's orbit, and the obliquity of the ecliptic [1]).

The obliquity in how LLMs are optimized is definitely a paradigm shift.

The glacial transitions are somewhat predictable as they are triggered by favorable isolation conditions due to the eccentricity, obliquity and precession of the Earth.

And obliquity is ubiquitous - it can even be applied to happiness.

> Tides drive the planet’s obliquity to zero, meaning that the planet’s equator is perfectly aligned with its orbit.

Recommended reading on this topic, "Obliquity" by John Kay is excellent.

Obliquity describes the process of achieving objectives indirectly, such as the financial success that comes from a real commitment to business.

I had the privilege last night of attending a lecture given by Prof Sir John Kay (Obliquity, Radical Uncertainty, etc).

I was just gonna say that the Intel case may fit well in this book called Obliquity[0], which ironically discusses Boeing.