non-smokers

The non-smokers who will stop going to an establishment when their smoking friends go somewhere else.

According to the CDC it takes 15 years to return to parity of risk with non-smokers.

Many restaurants actually have a separate, glass-enclosed section for smokers so they don't bother non-smokers.

It's like responding to an argument that you should stop smoking by saying that even non-smokers suffer health problems and die.

I know its a side point, but I gather that smokers actually cost the UK NHS less than non-smokers, because smokers tend to die younger and faster than non-smokers.

The children of smokers need hospital treatment more often than the children of non-smokers.

The warnings on the packaging are mostly targeted at non-smokers who might become smokers.

With smoking we could minimise the negative externalities for non-smokers (ban on smoking in public places etc.).

I would imagine that the parents complaining about the WiFi radiations are very probable to be non-smokers.

I would classify someone who smokes in their car with non-smokers in their presence, children and adults alike, as jerks.

Quit smoking in and around buildings where non-smokers live and work.

Fun fact smokers process/eliminate caffeine from their bodies quicker than non-smokers.

Non-smokers who drink already have established places where they go.

Non-smokers often seem to overlook that fact.