non-muslims

The difference is that we don't have sudo-government states mounting attacks and beheading massive amounts of non-muslims.

Even in the off chance that the host is being decent, they imposed so much regulations on non-Muslims that they would end up converting.

You should know that the non-Muslims were waiting for the Prophet to do anything non-conventional to criticize him.

One of the reasons a Jewish State was established is that Islam forbids equality between Muslims and non-Muslims.

For that matter non-muslims playing any role in the arab world is considered an abomination by fundamentalists.

The only thing I've heard is that the jizya is to refunded if the Muslims fail to defend the non-Muslims paying jizya if they're attacked.

The jizya (tax on non-Muslims) was a higher fee than the zakat (religious tax on Muslims).

Have you ever considered that it may be directed at the minds of the non-Muslims?

Doing so would seem to unfairly advance the anti-Islam sentiment in France by effectively silencing the acts of terrorism from non-Muslims.

Muslims are highly offended because they choose to identify with their religion in a way that is not considered normal by non-muslims.

Non-Muslims cannot testify in court and cannot even visit the city of Mecca.

It's turning things into a combative us (non-Muslims) vs them (Muslims) orientation.

"This verse is often cited to justify attacks of Muslims on non-Muslims both in classical exegesis and in contemporary jihadism" according to Wikipedia.

[Edit]: I originally put the phrases "Sunni" and "Shia" in quotes because they're usually misrepresented by non-muslims.