nazareth

You mean like Jesus of Nazareth or Buddha?

I just finished reading Zealot: The Life and Times of Jesus of Nazareth by Reza Aslan and found it quite fascinating.

>You mean like Jesus of Nazareth or Buddha?

Coming back to objective faith, belief in the historical Jesus of Nazareth falls apart if he was not in fact historical, since faith in him depends upon historical facts.

It seems to me reasonable to say that the physical sciences can, for example, lend very little or no credence to the claim that Jesus of Nazareth was the long expected Messiah of the Jews, i.e.

I might choose to believe that Jesus of Nazareth was born of a virgin in Bethlehem, and that later he both did and did not die, since he was seen again by humans after the time of his apparent decease.

His title for the book was "The Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth," which tells us a lot about his motivations.

>Do you deny the existence of Jesus of Nazareth, His divinity, or how the “church” defines it?

It's like "Jesus of Nazareth"; you wouldn't talk about "other OfNazareth's biographies".

The demographic was "Cheese Makers", and the answers were "Cheeses of Nazareth", then others like "Fromage to Eternity", "The Rock Fort" etc.

Isn't there a place in Portugal (Nazareth?) which has even more massive waves than Mavericks?

The Yahweh of the new testament is, at best, a literary invention of Greek novelists and the charlatan Jesus of Nazareth.

In about a hundred years, there'll be a kid named Jesus born in Nazareth.