morte

See the Morte language proposed (not sure if actively developed) by Gabriel Gonzalez, author of many popular Haskell libraries.

Within a language like the Calculus of Coinductive Constructions like Morte appears to implement it's not such a strange idea to have normalization.

Yes, we almost all know what morte means.

Thomas Malory's book Le Morte D'Arthur became a bestseller because of the right timing - Guttenberg invented his printing press at just about that time.

Almost every native English speaker knows the meaning of morte.

Did the author claim Morte was Turing-complete?

A great example is the one from the post where `morte` optimizes the function `#and #True` to the identity function on `#Bool`s even though it doesn't yet know what the second argument would be.

Morte means "death" in Latin and also in my native language (Portuguese).

You also have Mallory's "Le Morte d'Arthur" (no talking skull involved in this one).

Tyro n'allait pas de main morte!" which can be (very roughly) translated into: "____!

How will be Morte used to do "real work"?

To rephrase/expand your tl'dr slightly: you can express turing complete programs using Morte.

You can't encode the Collatz Conjecture (in that way) in Morte.

Everybody here knows that it's my mission to introduce Haskell more at Twitter and I have two long plays to do so (Morte is part of one of them).