monarchal

I mean, the UK is still has vestigial Monarchal components as opposed to the US constitution which was built from the ground up with severe limits and federation of power.

However the idea didn't work: monarchal rule returned, and returned in a stronger and more powerful form.

It's clear to me many of the European colonies post & during Monarchal Empires were exploited.

They do have an obligation to improve the common welfare: that’s why corporations were allowed to exist sans monarchal decree.

You have these little monarchal structures that go out and create something in the world.

I gotta say that I find the rabid anti-monarchal take a lot of americans have online kinda weird.

This pattern goes back to Napoleon: the idea being that the democratic states created by the invading armies were more legitimate/self-determined than the existing monarchal states.

Making the chiefs and sachems more akin to elected officials and not the monarchal leaders we often associate with today in indigenous culture.

America kickstarted the whole monarchal upheaval movement in 1776 and we had to fight the world's largest empire for it with our own guns.

It's entirely possible that a superintelligence could be incorruptible and an unrestrainable ally of the little guy, tricking its way through training overseen by the greedy/depopulationist/monarchal/sociopathic corporation(s) that birth it.

Authority is often derived in tribal cultures from being the best hunter/warrior, or being the son of the best fighter if the tribe has a monarchal structure of leadership transfer.

This is true enough in many parts of the world, but a careful reading of the history of English Common Law reveals a fascinatingly iterative legal process that formed a bulwark against monarchal oppression for hundreds of years.