minimum

2 weeks of real vacation, as an absolute minimum, per year. Take unpaid leave if you need to.

Here's the minimum I need to even bother talking to a recruiter. That means that for me to accept the offer, it probably needs more than this.

Young attorneys were being billed out at $500+ per hour and pressured to make their minimum hourly quotas every year. Our offices were expensive.

If you fail, try again until you either have $0k left, or a business that makes some sort of bare minimum profit. If that doesn't sound fun to you, then get a job at a startup and learn as much as you can while you are there.

There is another initiative asking for a minimum wage of 4000CHF per month. The median swiss salary is close to 6000CHF[1].

At the very minimum, it'll put the breaks on any plans they're currently working on. At best, it'll help you move forward as a company without having these sorts of problems lurking about in the shadows.

Every single goddamn thing I try to accomplish while setting up a server involves a minimum of 1 hour of googling and tinkering. Installing PHP?

By US standards, this actually seems to be a good salary: significantly better than working full time at minimum wage. It would cover all my current expenses handily.

Unfortunately, a minimum of effort goes into creating a lasting product with a proper valuation, so the moment that most investors realize that they aren't going to make their money back, ka-boom. Dot bomb all over again.

They should raise the minimum wage for factory workers, create more stringent regulation and make great effort to ensure those regulations are followed. This is where invalidOrTaken's point about corruption comes in.

With a lot of care and attention to detail, though, you can make something that's simple, not distracting, made from the barest components necessary and extremely good at solving a very specific problem with minimum fuss. When that happens, it's so nice to see.

Sony is a damaged brand, they've done lots of terribly stupid stuff but at a minimum they should be given the benefit of the doubt until there is hard proof they did this on purpose. We all know Sony fucked up in the past but that is no reason to automatically assume they did so again without any proof.

=== I was completely wrong about Om, it does not continuously trigger rerendering/diffing ever 16ms with rAF. It only uses rAF to batch rendering, so multiple repaints are throttled to a minimum of 16ms === The on-screen issue is interesting; I need to think about it more to see if we can actually leverage it in production apps. I think we can for large list views.

Now, we're not talking about American legal policy on things like wrongful imprisonment by the LA Crash unit, idiotic "3-strikes your out" laws, or minimum sentencing laws. I'm talking the actual conditions of the prisons in the US as labeled by organizations like Amnesty International.

Any material difference in any of these categories renders the trial completely and totally meaningless, because at a minimum it unblinds the doctors on the ground. Pointing out a few random oversights out of the thousands of clinical trials that occur every year is not proof of evil on the part of pharma; it is a testament to the care that goes into their design.

Dixons is everything that Apple should never be; terrible customer service, clueless minimum wage staff, horrible retail experience, and generally used only by people who desperately need something immediately or are too naive to find another store. Recent news out of Apple regarding "cutbacks" at retail suggested he was nudging them in the same direction.

The money transmitter laws are basically laws that give state governments the authority to require that bonds be provided, that minimum capitalization requirements be met, and that other precautions taken, to ensure that whoever handles escrowed monies takes prudent steps to protect those whose funds are entrusted to them. If these laws are violated, the state authorities have the power to take legal actions to enforce them.

Here's the flipside: --most people working in Amazon warehouses are employed by temporary staffing firms, not Amazon --most people working in Amazon warehouses don't come anywhere near 3 years of tenure before quitting or being fired --reimbursement is limited to $2,000/year for four years, while $5,000/year is pretty much the minimum direct cost to take such programs --the program is limited to full-time workers, so only those who can take classes while working full-time and mandatory-or-you-get-fired overtime can partake The number of warehouse workers eligible for this is nearly zero. Might even be precisely zero.