mauling

My cat could be 100 lbs and she'd still be more interested in kibble and pillows than mauling me.

Imagine the ridiculous spectacle of taking a bear to court for mauling another animal, or a person.

It's not genocide, racism, or environmentally destructive to eliminate dangerous (meaning: capable of mauling or killing a healthy adult) dog breeds.

If you are suspected of mauling someone, as a non-citizen you are afforded the same rights to a fair trial as citizens.

Something in the JS on the individual gallery pages is mauling my CPU.

Theyre weaker than a cat, unless its one of those massive hares, and have you ever heard a cat mauling someones leg off?

The FTC should be mauling Apple for resting on anticompetitive laurels, but instead they're letting them grow fat and become a high-risk business.

Yes after eliminating or mauling those they don't consider worthy living;) lol hahaha.

The Soviet and Vietnamese pilots were pretty badly mauling the US Air Force and Navy, whose armament and tactics were built around bomber interception.

It's certainly not worth mauling a baby to find no drugs.

The Pitbulls of Australia seem to have a habit of mauling and killing small children on a regular basis, more so than any other dog breed.

Are you really going to argue that any human with any semblance of intelligence (and I don't mean deep thought here) would have to risk mauling to hunt for subsistence?

Raping is not (to them) an essential/defining characteristic of a dickwolf any more than "mauling" is an essential/defining characteristic of a bear.

So before you try to find semblances of "what could arguably be considered genocide", to mauling millions upon millions of human beings for decades all for one single man.

Just today I saw a post (on Reddit) 'Mauling' over whether to get a Framework 16 or not (I assume that English was not their native tongue).