licitly

I can licitly refuse treatment for a disease (the distinction between ordinary and extraordinary care), but I cannot licitly make use of immoral means to treat a disease.

We're not lawyers and we cannot licitly give legal advice, but part of the service is that we can introduce you to lawyers.

And then there are the benefits each industry and many private companies obtain from government, licitly and otherwise.

Can she licitly take chemo, knowing this risk, or even knowing that certain harm will come?

The state can licitly permit certain evils if banning them leads to a worse situation, given the crooked state of humanity.

Drugs may be licitly provided in any amount necessary for that pain management.

It is an anthropological position taken on what it means to be human, what human sexuality is about and therefore on sexual morality, the social relations that can licitly follow, etc.

This places rather severe limits on what you can licitly say or express.

The obfuscation of licitly-acquired funds used for illicit purposes is still money laundering.

Even disarmed combatants who pose no threat cannot be licitly attacked.

According to canon law, a Catholic church must be desacralized (or deconsecrated) in order to be licitly used for other, though not just any, purposes[0].

If that was the case, that would definitely mean he is not a state actor, which is defined as «An entity that is a part of, or which operates licitly or semi-licitly on behalf or in service of, a government agency.».

The way the snippet defines things, whichever person calls the other (illicitly-)"intolerant" first gets to be (licitly-)intolerant of the other.

When I receive images from my friends, they don't go into my photo library until I explicitly tap "save".

Hunting elephants, licitly or otherwise, is not and never can be "murder tourism".

But while we may licitly refuse disproportionate care, at least in many cases, we cannot intentionally cause the death of anyone (ourselves or another; the "self-ownership" thesis is likely responsible for the view that we can licitly do anything to ourselves as if we were some kind of property, but we are not objects, and what is morally good is objective and not fully accounted for by consent, or utility).