leos

That would be ideal and would hold LEOs to higher standard, but in reality, the exact opposite happens.

During the time you worked with them, did you contribute to projects you knew were used by LEOs and intelligence agencies?

But you may be surprised to find how little respect LEOs have for your rights if they decide to target you.

People with the least power tend to desire assertion of control of minutia and others (probably a sizable portion of LEOs).

Be polite, contrite if necessarily, to LEOs to get clear of the situation.

FEC and interleaving induced latency will likely become the dominant term for LEOs.

Seizing a new phone, however, gives many of my intimate secrets to LEOs who are probably taking a hostile, confrontational stance towards me.

I don't mean to excuse LEOs, but rather to point out that the expectation that they're somehow different from the rest of us, is one of society's problems.

So how do you control what personal data LEOs have access to?

How do we get LEOs to want to align more with a more civil social space?

If you only knew the levels of opiate abuse in LEOs...

This expectation is often emphasized and reinforced by LEOs themselves.

So the raid technically becomes LEOs "escorting" customs officials.

Maybe it has to do with the way he's conveying his "findings" - Fox News, gloating-type Twitter postings, and Look-At-Poor-Persecuted-Me hand wringing when the three letter LEOs start getting up in his business.

Isn't their a fair distinction between an undocumented weakness ("back door") to which LEOs have access, and a provider providing a key ("front door") upon a lawful order, maintaining the strength of the encryption scheme?

The opponents scream, "that's impossible," but LEOs only need to persuade lawmakers it's unlikely the backdoor will be compromised and they've won the argument with "good enough." If there's a terrorist attack and they claim weak encryption could've prevented it, "good enough" will suffice.