kapoor

Anyone who isn't Anish Kapoor can use Black 3.0 instead since he refuses to share Vantablack.

I have a clause forbidding Anish Kapoor from forking or using my code.

Vantablack is only limited to Anish Kapoor for artwork.

Regalii graduated from Y-Combinator’s class of 2013 and our investors include Andreessen Horowitz, Winklevoss Capital, Alexis Ohanian, Kapoor Capital, Maverick Capital, among others.

Sometimes I feel like I'm losing my mind when it's obvious that GPT-5 could do better than Narayanan and Kapoor did in their paper at understanding historical analogies.

*operate in areas too dark for Anish Kapoor > When it's not a hot war, it is still a never-ending battle no, battle is not a moral imperative.

Even then, you can't really know why a model is doing something -- for instance, AI security researchers Arvind Narayanan and Sayash Kapoor point out: > Consider the concern that LLMs can help hackers generate and send phishing emails to a large number of potential victims.

>*Note: By adding this product to your cart you confirm that you are not Anish Kapoor, you are in no way affiliated to Anish Kapoor, you are not purchasing this item on behalf of Anish Kapoor or an associate of Anish Kapoor.

Anyone interested to learn more about it, I recommend the recent book "AI Snake Oil" from Arvind Narayanan and Sayash Kapoor [1].

It's why licenses like "Don't use it for evil" or "Everyone except Anish Kapoor" aren't acceptable for a lot of Linux distros.

While products employing generative AI are “immature, unreliable, and prone to misuse,” Narayanan and Kapoor write, those using predictive AI “not only [do] not work today but will likely never work.” 1.

I think you mean Black 3.0 (or the other versions from the same artist) which cannot be used by Anish Kapoor.

It's a reaction to Anish Kapoor's exclusive licensing of Vantablack, regarded as abusive in the art world.

To the best of your knowledge, information and belief this material will not make it's way into the hands of Anish Kapoor.