justiciable

The Judiciary is meant to resolve justiciable [civil] controversies, and in its more boring role to try criminal cases.

We merely ensure, in justiciable cases, that the Executive Branch acts within the confines of the Constitution and federal statutes.

Patents make sense for some industries, where inventions are clear (or at least justiciable) and product lifecycles are measured in half-decades.

A court of law would be the proper place to resolve this, presuming the case was justiciable, which is another issue.

I think you’d need an act of Congress to limit liability as long as certain easily justiciable standards were met.

It, in part emphasized that relevant Royal Prerogative powers are non-justiciable.

Edit: I'm not fully up-to-date on the law, but my understanding is that there is no justiciable crime in Texas around a woman herself terminating a pregnancy using medical means.

The court should have refused the case as non justiciable, it takes 2 votes in a single afternoon to settle a binary question of legislative intent.

And most of the analysis of Glidden focuses on things like the courts' ability to hear justiciable cases and controversies and to exercise the Article III judicial power.

Note that the judge did not find that any of the websites are products or subject to product liability, only that there is a justiciable dispute of fact on that point.

Kind of weird to post a 2013 article about an appellate decision that simply ruled that the question in the title was a justiciable question of fact that should be tried here.

Were such a right to exist under the Constitutiom, federalism would no longer require the federal courts to stay out of state cases involving such claims, since there would br a justiciable question of federal law.

Aka “summary judgement”, where the judge assumes everything side A alleges is true, and evaluates if there is even a justiciable claim.

They could say that, but they won't, because "unequal impositions or discriminations aforesaid" is a straightforwardly justiciable question.

The question of whether the "alien is within one or more of the following classes" should be justiciable.

Although there is some debate about what the "republican form of government" clause means, it arguably doesn't rule out parliamentary republicanism, and Luther v Borden (1849) ruled the clause wasn't justiciable anyway.