inteligence

Any claim that Amdahl's law will forbid human-like inteligence must explain why that isn't a problem to us.

I doubt Kimi would do well with most harnesses, its outputs are pretty chaotic in terms of formatting but the inteligence is definitely there.

I guess inteligence [sic] is what inteligence [sic] does.

Imagine intelligent life evolved in huge game of life grid (it's possible assuming inteligence is turing-complete).

This whole witch hunt by the US is hypocritical, given that the NSA is trawling the whole worlds commucations looking for commercial and economic inteligence, to be fed to US companies.

The fact that, say, a 32GB model seemingly holds approximate knowlege of everything implies some unexplored relationship between inteligence and compression.

What if one of those evolve to inteligence on a low gravity planet.

Someone might go great lengths of inteligence to create something utterly complex.

And I dont think that own goals are a neccessary condition for general inteligence.

Remember that the polygraph still exists, now we will be dealing with a massive portion of the decision makers will treat as artificial inteligence not in the technical sense we use, but as real inteligence, maybe even super-inteligence.

Why do we assume enough inteligence = consciousness?

I think that Michio Kaku talked about how with nanotech it is possible to attack cancer cells precisely, so that imho that is some point of inteligence in your body then..

That is why people hate the term AI because it is just partial capability of “inteligence” or it might even be complete illusion of inteligence that is nowhere close what people would expect.

BTW it's also amusing how not only iCloud doesn't flag a false Apple billing phishing message as junk but Apple """Inteligence""" will highlight it as priority.