inhabitable

That would not preserve our species, should planet Earth become inhabitable.

Do you think that we'll be able to move to another inhabitable planet in the next few decades? I'm not holding my breath.

The amount of "poisoning" that happened will make the land inhabitable ever again? How much farm land would have to stop producing crops to give way to wind turbines?

Looking for other life and inhabitable planets. No reason to think aliens wouldn't do the same.

Self correcting doesn't need to include self correcting and inhabitable by humans.

This has to happen sooner or later if we want to ensure that our race lives on, after our planet becomes inhabitable. With all this in mind, it's better to do this sooner rather than later.

Or finding out the planet is no longer inhabitable. Lets not forget our own Earth has entered periods where it was one massive boiling ocean, one big icicle, a bunch of lava.

Japan - 4/5 of territory is inhabitable. China - the same.

No one with the money to fire at earth, will actually fire at earth, because it is more valuable as an inhabitable planet. If each side can obliterate whatever is being fought over, you basically have an instant MAD scenario.

Travel to an inhabitable planet which may be millions of light-years away; 3. Geo-engineer that planet to the extent that it can self-sustain a moderate human population.

If I counted myself among those who have called the Tenderloin home for years, I would despise the people who seek to terraform my home making it inhabitable to me while they make it habitable to themselves. [0] Read about Carolyn Abst's attempts to arborize the Tenderloin.

Would there be inhabitable regions on earth that are abandoned because everyone moved away? Would there be countries that attract all the "desirable" citizen while other countries collapse because they were left with "undesirable" citizens?

The refuge is large amounts of at least moderately inhabitable land, with minimal militia or violence threat. I used to like NZ as well, but I'm favoring Canada these days, it has an obscenely immense amount of territory to disappear into.

So habitable means something supports life and inhabitable means intending to live there is viable, possibly with some modifications to the environment to make it habitable. Just a minor nitpick.

I understand climate change as a shift in the parts of the earth that are inhabitable due to rising sea levels, wilder weather events, etc. Another planet mightn't help with antibiotic resistance.

Space travel will solve for moving the human race to further inhabitable planets, but not without a solution for the more important lifespan issue which is a requirement for extended space travel. We've got 4 billion years before our sun runs out and before the Andromeda galaxy will cause us a bit of trouble.

There are many square kilometers around Chernobyl which were rendered uninhabitable from that accident. In Fukushima's case nowhere will be rendered un-inhabitable.

As I said, it's obvious, if aliens were cruising around the universe the whole purpose of it would be to find other intelligent life and inhabitable planets and interesting stuff. If we were doing it, that would obviously be our purpose, there's no reason to think that wouldn't be the purpose of any other intelligent life.

The end-point of unstoppable climate-change could potentially render the entire earth inhabitable via the Venus-effect. Even most apocalyptic local consequences are pretty minor compared to those.

I would consider myself conservative in the true sense of the word: I want to preserve favorable conditions, a sustainable enviroment, an inhabitable planet and free and open knowledge and culture for future generations.

So an "inhabitable place" is on where people could live. If you mean "a place where people can't live", the correct term is "uninhabitable". Note - the word "habitable" means the same thing as "inhabitable". It is just one of those confusing English language things, where all rules are more "guidelines" than hard rules, and there are exceptions to the exceptions. Another word that follows a similar pattern: flammable and inflammable mean the same thing. Namely "easy to burn or start on fire". So I think that to support the empty statement in your first sentence, your second sentence should read: Japan - 4/5 of territory is uninhabitable.

"terraform my home making it inhabitable to me while they make it habitable to themselves." Inhabitable means habitable. [0] You may need the word "uninhabitable."