incorrectness

I think the question is—in the mentioned case, what manner of potential incorrectness is the least problematic?

Grade and high school history subjects often contain absurdly simplified material -- sometimes to the point of incorrectness.

Political incorrectness is more like a protocol to tolerate differences to some extent for a diversified society.

It's not a matter of correctness or incorrectness; it's a judgement about the relative costs.

You can't take my statement and apply it to future models or other Apple products and then marvel at their incorrectness.

The idea behind TDD is to do that as you develop the application, but even then you're not automatically saved from incorrectness and incompleteness.

As a handwavey argument, the proof could be incorrect, but if it were incorrect, the incorrectness would be more interesting than the current proof (i.e.

Here are the two that are probably the most egregious: - The whole object and string representation thing is naïve to the point of total incorrectness.

I'm sure whatever that industry is, will appreciate your opinions and political incorrectness.

If I am correct in my assessment of is incorrectness, that is right.

If that is impractical for your given domain, then you need to select the largest fixed-size numeric type that is practical and resign yourself to some degree of potential incorrectness.

And once the incorrectness of the system gets beyond of what the business will accept, it's very hard not to do a full rewrite, which is often very dangerous as well.

I'm commenting solely on the factual incorrectness of saying the above was not a deal, when it very clearly was, assuming "deal" means a more economical choice.

More importantly, the concept of making your intuitive sense of "rightness" and "wrongness" align with semantic correctness and incorrectness makes perfect sense.

> I'm commenting solely on the factual incorrectness of saying the above was not a deal, when it very clearly was, assuming "deal" means a more economical choice.

Apart from the incorrectness (is there any reason to believe a developer making a joke about dongles increases the risk of bodily harm?) -- what the hell does "your body" saying things have to do with anything?