imputed

This occurs when you've imputed new meaning and language into your monad, which is really cool.

Real people _interact_ with other real people, and there's a web of trust or certification which can be imputed or determined.

Their value is not imputed by scarcity, but as Adam Smith pointed out, by the labor it took to create them.

Putting 200k into a house should provide you with a risk-adjusted return similar to putting 200k into the S&P, including imputed rent.

If you look at flawed indicators like GDP, 10% of which is made up of imputed rent, then yes you will be fooled.

Plus, the partner who's not working has some very real imputed salary value.

But, why don't later investors insist on also learning the lowest possible imputed value, taking into account how investors are acting to protect themselves.

It sounds like some sort of in-game reward or skin for your avatar, and giving it an imputed value of $500 is pretty optimistic.

Edit: Sorry, is there something wrong with my pointing out that I didn't ever claim the things being imputed to me?

> But, why don't later investors insist on also learning the lowest possible imputed value, taking into account how investors are acting to protect themselves.

I counter-contend that corporations do far more good than Leftists give credit for, and compelling payment of high taxes would undo that good, making a much bigger mess than is imputed upon them now.

Are you actually contending that the views imputed to conservatives by toomuchtodo are not widespread, or are you just invoking a No True Scotsman fallacy by saying that those views shouldn't count despite their prevalence because they fall outside of the lines you want to draw?

The data is done by survey, and missed surveys are "imputed".

Instead we have "rates", based on imputed rental value and paid by the occupier of a property.

Judging by the Subway example which spent "5 millions $" to upgrade its "cyber security systems" (what?), almost any direct or indirect loss or cost incurred during or after the hacker attack can be imputed to the perpetrator.

> I also didn't say you are spreading lies maliciously My objection wasn't that you imputed malice; it was that you went straight to "spreading lies" instead of expressing uncertainty about what I meant.