ignorantia

— Nicholas of Cusa, De Docta Ignorantia (On Learned Ignorance) Also Carse's book has footnotes but no bibliography!

I find it very scary that we accept a principle such as Ignorantia juris non excusat but don't bother teaching law and make it understandable to common people.

I mean, the fundamental responsibility of citizens is to adhere to the law (ignorantia juris non excusat); the fundamental responsibility of government is to make the law available to citizens because it is not reasonable to require compliance with laws that are not practically available to citizens.

Showing your local government that you have a process in place to renew your TLS certificates, and your provider was down is most likely going to be more than enough to indemnify you for any kind of maliciousness or ignorance (ignorantia juris non excusat).

This (re: citizens violating classified laws or legal interpretations) is definitely a situation where any sane judge/jury would find against the ignorantia juris non excusat principle, so I don't expect the use of any of this to hold up in any court, ever, not just because its effects are potentially unconstitutional.

The concept of "Ignorance of the law is no excuse" (Ignorantia juris non excusat) was really only ever meant in the context of natural laws, e.g.

When legislatures churn out volumes and volumes of bills every single year, "ignorantia juris non excusat" non excusat.

If you agree with "ignorantia juris non excusat" then student from China is right.

A great quote is 'Ignorantia juris non excusat' which translates out to 'ignorance of the law excuses no one'.

Judges think everyone is supposed to know the law ("ignorantia juris non excusat").

Besides, civilians get the "ignorantia juris non excusat" [0] principle, and the rule of law means that everybody, including government officials and law enforcement, should be held to the same standard.

> "Ignorantia juris non excusat" is precedent for any democratic state.

The concept of "Ignorance of the law is no excuse" (Ignorantia juris non excusat) was really only ever meant in the context of natural laws, e.g.

When legislatures churn out volumes and volumes of bills every single year, "ignorantia juris non excusat" non excusat.

If you agree with "ignorantia juris non excusat" then student from China is right.

Judges think everyone is supposed to know the law ("ignorantia juris non excusat").

A great quote is 'Ignorantia juris non excusat' which translates out to 'ignorance of the law excuses no one'.

'Ignorantia juris non excusat' This would have been logical with short and understandable laws.