harmless

These are totally harmless, and, with 3 million per year, you would need them to be so.

It's fun and everyone likes to have a bit of harmless sex with new people once in a while.

Immoral businesses rely on government force to prevent other citizens freely engaging in otherwise harmless transactions for mutual benefit.

From the article it sounds like they're equally redundant but harmless other than taking up space in a directory listing.

Using the same word for unmanned military bombers and (relatively) harmless toys seems a bit counter-productive.

Some are relatively harmless, like people insisting that Earth was the center of the universe.

Even if the information itself is harmless, this could add substantial expense and hassle.

Plenty of harmless activities are illegal, and plenty of harmful activities are legal.

The way I think many of them deal with this is by over-controlling obviously harmless, law-abiding people.

I realize that under some circumstances the training is beneficial, but I have seen way too many examples of various armed officials using excessive verbal/physical force with obviously harmless people.

I imagine banning /64 networks is completely harmless, but I'm not really confident on that.

For regular pharmaceuticals, that 2% is likely to be harmless.

I don't think something that harmless would go past "somewhat dickish" for most people.

Anecdotally and in my area I can confirm racism and sexism (usually in the form of "harmless jokes") is pretty rampant in tech.

I then waited for a moment until he backed away and got back out of the car and said, "Ok, you are making a mistake, we are harmless" etc.

The denotation of "Sieg Heil" is completely harmless, but you have no problem with understanding its connotation and you don't go around saying it when the denotation fits because you know that only Nazis say "Sieg Heil".