haircuts

The current services include male haircuts, female haircuts, blowouts, makeup and updo, all from the comfort of your home.

It just seems like a bunch of old men with bad haircuts, how scary could that possibly be?

Also, licencing hairdressers doesn't even prevent fuck ups from happening there, that's people with nontrivial haircuts (the group of hairdresser clients formerly known as women) pay so much for haircuts.

There are many, many people who skip showering, haircuts, exercise and washing dishes and still easily find a girlfriend.

Bring the pension system and other spending in line in exchange for some haircuts on the debt- that's the fair answer.

There have been several haircuts to the Greek debt, including stretching of payment goals.

If private credits really had to absorb 50% haircuts on $100 billion of debt, point me to the massive string of bankruptcies?

There would be secondary effects, too, as some of the money earned would be spent on locally-produced goods/services like lattes and haircuts.

In fact, it was one of the biggest haircuts ever in history.

The paper talks about creditors taking haircuts, but then in the next paragraph that this resulted in very little actual debt relief for Greece?

You don't have a right to healthcare, to healthy food, to haircuts, to welfare, or even to happiness at my expense.

For some strange reason, the idea of this being the Uber for haircuts, even down to the flagrant disobedience of licensure, is hilarious to me.

Like instead of earning 2000$, you would earn "a new TV and a Microwave, and 10 haircuts".

If I understand correctly, the "haircuts" are projections based on net present value using some arbitrary high discount rates (the paper mentions 9%!!!) so you have to appreciate that with a different discount rate you could claim the private debt holders were actually being paid even > 100 cents on the dollar.