formalization

My best guess would be a formalization of the design contracts that they imply exist between the components implementing them.

Just look at Yudkowski's work a few years ago on CEV and you'll see how any attempt at formalization falls apart.

Imo it's a much nicer modeling language, especially for incremental formalization, in part because of implementing a nonmonotonic rather than classical logic.

It's basically a formalization of 'doxing' - an overarching framework to work with personally identifying data from sources of varying degrees of trustworthiness.

Ideally you should be able to specify almost the same arguments for formalization.

It's just a technical formalization of something that's already in the Baseline Requirements.

Apart from Voevodsky's work, there are several other big math formalization projects.

Is there any formalization of how to invert a formatter, or is this just something they're figuring out in code as they go along?

It's a broad category with several centuries of formalization behind it.

) The is a newer formalization of calculus, called non-standard analysis, that works with infinitesimals, called the hyperreals.

This study is essentially a formalization of that observation.

I think this[0] is a good formalization of what I'm trying to say.

The boundary already existed, the API is just the "formalization" of that.

I have benefited a lot from Benjamin Graham's formalization of value investing - he wrote the classic "Intelligent Investor".

Arrow's Theorem doesn't prove that, it proves that (for a particular formalization of on intuition of what is "perfect") there is no perfect way of taking rank-order-preference inputs from a group and producing a rank-order-preference output that is the aggregated preference.