Flatware used in a sentence

Flatware in a sentence as a noun

He died in 2011 but his flatware lives on. A whole year.

I have never even given flatware or towels any thought.

It's great that there are publishers like Phaidon who sell books about door handles or flatware or whatnot.

I'd suggest he familiarize himself with "wedding gift"-style flatware.

I don't know where you shop, but the "traditional flatware" of my people is whatever was cheap enough at the department store.

Why on earth would I waste all of the time and money to have the "best" flatware?My car on the other hand I felt merited some research.

Maybe he's a startup geek and lives lean.-Hmm, further down he says he bought flatware at $50/5pc, and everything he's purchased is of like quality.

If I'm correct, it outlined this culture of rich, dcurtis-like backpackers who spend $50 on a five piece flatware set and live out of their suitcases.

Did you read the full article?He's not claiming to be an 'arbiter of quality' at all, he's using the flatware as an example.

There being a bunch of expensive flatware in existence is just a straw man's rebuttal to the point that affordable flatware works just fine.

The author of this linked article has made an error: he assumes dcurtis' flatware is inordinately expensive.

I was sort of with you until this:> What's wrong with understanding flatware?This is exactly the thinking the supports rampant materialism.

Most people get a decent set of flatware, a decent towel, and a decent backpack because we have non-materialistic things we need to invest our time and money in.

Having good tools is great but throwing away 20 sets of flatware until you stay on with the 21th is a form of minimalism only for the rich, and absolutely not practical.

Materialism isn't just owning a bunch of stuff, it's being defined by it, by which I mean your thinking about yourself and life is deep set into the things you own. If you're spending hours reading about flatware and justifying it as educational or explorational, you're falling into the trap.

From dustin's article:"Reasonable people would probably not spend the time to read a book about the history of flatware, buy twenty sets, and test the feeling of each metal utensil against their teeth.

But in fact dcurtis was a bit arrogant too:"Reasonable people would probably not spend the time to read a book about the history of flatware, buy twenty sets, and test the feeling of each metal utensil against their teeth.

I mean, if he says 'I love this flatware because it has these beautiful proportions, is manufactured in such-and-such a way, and exudes timeless quality etc. etc.', then great - he's a good designer, I'm interested in his aesthetic philosophy.

" I would say it is getting a bit arrogant, but still ok, because he just values interesting hobbies...But in dcurtis's case 'reasonable people' are people who have absoultely no money to buy twenty sets of designer flatware, because they literally would not be able to feed their children.