flanker

It seems to me that the problem is the other way around, risking the loss of a Flanker to take down a drone.

Also, a Su-35 Flanker cant fire a missile at 50km without radar lock, which would be difficult against a F-35.

But if what you're saying is true then I can see a very good argument for replacing email with flanker.

And this is precisely why I fly the Supermaneuverable Sukhoi Su-35 Flanker E Advanced Fighter [1].

I'm working on a new email platform,[1] and we've been testing Flanker quite a bit.

Yeah, in the Su-27 Flanker that is exactly what it is.

And while the Russians have been cranking out one fancy Flanker variant after another, they haven't had the funds to build them in any quality.

You have to be capable of intercepting the real threats like the Tu-160 or Flanker strike formations, neither of which the F-35 can do much about.

The possibility doesn't seem to have been brought up here, but I wouldn't take it as given that Flanker made it home.

I appreciate how the Flanker release includes benchmarks without thrashing on alternative implementations.

> Also, a Su-35 Flanker cant fire a missile at 50km without radar lock, which would be difficult against a F-35.

I think it's a switch in the Flanker as well.

Was with 2 providers (Teksavvy and eBox) that jacked up their prices above what the "flanker" providers by incumbents were charging.

But Flanker's full-message parser is still 8x faster than email.parser's full-message parser, according to their benchmark.

It made me fall in love with the real-life Flanker.

Where does the project name (Flanker) come from?