Extradition used in a sentence

Extradition in a sentence as a noun

Can it make a binding ruling against extradition that the UK must abide by?7.

I assume in those cases that is a real issue so it seems like there is some room for movement when it comes to extradition;6.

Not honouring the EAW would have huge implications for extradition cases across Europe.

I feel a cautious pride to see that there is an effective pushback from our courts against what is an unjust extradition attempt.

He's appealing extradition on technical grounds, and it's about time he went to Sweden and faced the judicial system there.

Is there any substantive difference in extradition proceedings from the UK or Sweden?

What is the status of Assange's legal proceedings against extradition to Sweden?

I know EU countries have, in the past, as a condition of extradition required the US to guarantee that the death penalty won't be sought or applied.

"Technical grounds", in this case, means "the extradition request was never written by anyone the UK considers to be a valid authority".

I'm British, and I am largely ashamed that pressure is not being placed on Sweden by the foreign minister to have them reinvestigate the extradition request.

It would be appalling not to grant it, while obviously allowing Russia to pursue normal legal channels to apply for extradition.

It would have been interesting if Snowden had holed up in Germany instead of HK. I wonder if the inevitable US military extradition would have tested the tolerance of the Germans.

As far as I'm concerned, the US's cultural acceptance of prison rape should be enough to stop any extradition to the US for any crime that would garner prison time.

A few months ago the HK high court ruled that the process for applying for asylum needs overhaul, and until that happens all extradition proceedings for asylum seekers are on hold.

I think it's quite likely Assange will be handed over to Sweden, but not because of some vendata or conspiracy - simply because he has no case with regards to his extradition.

Someone ordered this material released to try to counter the massive pressure the NZ government is under locally not to do comply with US requests for extradition.

Has the US formally charged, indicated they would charge, sought extradition or otherwise indicated they would seek extradition of Assange or is it merely assumed?4.

How normal is it for a country to offer political asylum to someone in another country who is a citizen of a third country resisting extradition to a fourth?

It is argued by Assange's defenders that it is easier from Sweden and a UK judge may well throw out the request as being politically motivated whereas extradition from Sweden, it is argued, can be done politically rather than through the courts.

In the interest of gauging people's opinions, does anyone disagree with this particular point?Additionally, regardless of what lawyers are saying about the specifics of this case, extraditions are largely politically motivated.

Provided you never travel to, though or over the USA, volitionally or by ill luck, nor hold assets there, provided your government doesn't have a cravenly subservient extradition-at-whim treaty, and provided you aren't high profile enough for them to bend rules, then US laws probably don't apply to you.