ex-felons

Its pretty clear: To justify having a subset of ex-felons [sex offenders] on the list, all ex-felons have to be on the list.

S., I take issue with the fact that ex-felons are denied the right to vote Well, ex-felons can become Potus, so that's that.

The more professional ex-felons who approach them, the better equipped they will be to serve people like us.

Otherwise, the justification [they are sex offenders] falls flat when other types of ex-felons commit sex offenses more frequently.

Their secret, though, is inducting only ex-felons who genuinely want to turn their life around.

The rest of the guys/girls should be allowed to associate with other ex-felons.

Why make it so difficult for ex-felons to succed after being let lose?

When I was released (federal prison, not California), my conditions of supervised release prohibited me from associating with other ex-felons.

Stop taking the linkbait for fact: the reality is that young black men or ex-felons bear a far, far higher burden of extralegal discrimination than anyone does as the result of ham-fisted federal rulemaking.

S., I take issue with the fact that ex-felons are denied the right to vote.

Do California's parole rules allow parolees to associate with ex-felons?

Because preventing ex-felons and mentally deranged people from buying guns (well, anyone who hasn't had a background check done) is an effective form of gun control.

It hurts a lot of the working class, where "no ex-felons" is a cheap and legal filter.

There's currently a "split" between districts on whether or not banning ex-felons from gun possession violates the Second Amendment.

Ex-felons should not be able to get guns.