evictions

Cache evictions can also be monitored by CPU performance counters, so you can detect any that do occur.

The Rent Board's report notes that evictions for non-payment aren't required to be reported to them.

That's changing a bit, as more people feel the pressure of the rental market and evictions.

People who don't pay their rent constitute a minor fraction of all evictions in SF.

It's called the Ellis Act and San Francisco's regulations for Ellis Act evictions require payment of $5k-$15k + $3k per senior/disabled tenant.

When the renter signed their lease, the unit was covered by rent control, putting very tight restrictions on rent increases and evictions.

So that's a floor, not a cap, on the actual number of non-payment evictions.

CPU then can optimize memory access patterns and minimize L1/L2 cache evictions, because it knows this data should not be stored in cache.

Are you sure it wasn't an issue with cache evictions?

Rent control also directly causes Ellis Act evictions, IMO.

In California, this exists for certain kinds of evictions.

Are you required to disclose evictions to future landlords?

In other words, the Ellis Act causes Ellis Act evictions; not "rent control."

(That suggests it's not just a catch-all for wanting-richer-tenants.) There's also 349 "committing a nuisance" and 42 "illegal use" evictions.

You can't sweep all 607 "breach of agreement" evictions away as "pretexts" – those can involve serious issues too, and it's a large category even in years like 2002-2004 when rents were declining.

Currently in my country, with some thousands of evictions a day by the greedy of some "banksters" (formerly rescued by the people) a lot of people fantasize sometimes with a grand piano falling over the Minister of Finance in the most "ItchyScratchiest" way possible and that, after this, he rises and smiles with a denture of white keys, chirping birds around the head and all the stuff.