equites

Consider the cavalry (equites) [2]: > From the beginning of the 4th century bc, non-senators were enlisted in the cavalry; they provided their own horses (equites equo privato).

He can only mean the Templi Resurgentes Equites Synarchici.

If the senatorial class was roughly the billionaires, then the equites were the ten and hundred millionaires.

That's fair, since senatores was a political class, not an economic class, and equites was technically the top economic class.

So it's not unlikely that there were individual equites who were more wealthy than many Senators.

They should have bought harder assets, like oil company equites, timber and farm land, mining equities.

A lot of the equites market style comparisons to bitcoin is because it started with retail (non-institutional) who never traded anything else.

It's just an observation that equites are worth more when money supply increase and new business opportunities are difficult to come by.

But the blockchain can offer a significantly cheaper alternative to clearing costs for equites.

In either case the amount of americans who automatically devote a portion of their pay to buying equites has probably never been higher.

When it's difficult to do business and make better use of the money then equites are more attractive place to keep your money.

Did you look into forex at all, or was this strictly equites.

Also possible that they're thinking of the Roman Kingdom and the Equites?