Epidermis used in a sentence

Epidermis in a sentence as a noun

I have the most elegant proof of this, but my epidermis is too small to contain it."

For starters, the human epidermis turns over with a period on the order of 45 days.

Except it's not really a fingerprint reader - it scans under your epidermis. You can't get the fingerprint from the police files and create a fake finger to unlock the phone.

Your epidermis grows at a specific rate and will not really grow faster if you remove it. If you remove it faster, you will develop scar tissue, which is not desirable.

I value my ankles and epidermis at several dozen times "$1200 a piece". I consider your stance to be the utter epitome of foolishness.

> Comb on the other hand, is an epidermis for bees. It has it's own biota, a bacterial/fungal/viral ecosystem that provides a living layer on which the bees work and live.

Comb on the other hand, is an epidermis for bees. It has it's own biota, a bacterial/fungal/viral ecosystem that provides a living layer on which the bees work and live.

> skin reflects 20-30% of the power and the rest is almost completely absorbed by the epidermis. So 70% of the energy is absorbed by the skin. What does that much energy at those freqs do to the epidermis?

In new 60 Ghz 5G wavelengths skin reflects 20-30% of the power and the rest is almost completely absorbed by the epidermis. Overall the power densities are so slow that there is no reason to except anything.

First, we know they don't work, because they only work up to the epidermis, and sometimes not even that well, as lots of dangerous things have gotten through them. If you wanted to get something on a plane, put it up your butt or somehow else in your body and it will work 100% of the time.

Melanin is deposited in the epidermis, vitamin D conversion happens deeper, in the blood vessels of the dermis.

From the wikipedia article you linked to: Jellyfish have no brain nor central nervous system, but employ a loose network of nerves, located in the epidermis, which is called a "nerve net". Though they are brainless, they do have enough reflexes to get by.

Because it's a democracy with a very well established bureaucratic epidermis that stretches from federal to local level. It's a vast and complex entity that operates on defined rules.

Given that certain sterilizing UVC wavelengths are known to not penetrate the epidermis, could we just attach a bunch of LEDs tuned to that range to a headband or something instead of making people breathe through an enclosed apparatus?

There is a decrease in the concentration of 7-dehydrocholesterol in the epidermis in old compared with young individuals and a reduced response to UV light, resulting in a 50% decrease in the formation of previtamin D3

A finger requires afferent and efferent nerves, bone, cartilage, synovium, tendons, ligaments, vasculature, interstitium, muscle, dermis, and epidermis. It seems highly unlikely that we can regrow a finger given current technology.

If the Army officer in the Monty Python skit had said, “hmm, there seems to have been an incision made through my epidermis, muscle, and bone, resulting in a reduction of my ambulatory capacity”, that might have been funny in other ways but I don’t think it would have been understatement. Similarly, while I have no idea of the intent of the author of “kinetic energy weapon” phrase, I argue the language in question is not understatement.

All in all this is pretty hilarious and funny, however >More recently, in what is no doubt a manifestation of the desire to fit in with the majority, even dark-skinned minorities, whose epidermis is unsuited to tattooing, are having themselves tattooed in ever-larger numbers. smells a bit racist and ignorant to me, I mean, tattoos are part of African tribes culture for at least few millennia.

The title of the article is literally "Chronic irradiation with 222-nm UVC light induces neither DNA damage nor epidermal lesions" and a few sentences below the discussion of prior work they write "chronic irradiation with 222-nm UVC light was revealed not to induce mutagenic or cytotoxic effects in the epidermis".