eats

I hope it passes, and the economy of the US tanks, and it eats itself.

You'll pretty much be able to draw a straight line that divides who shits and who eats shit.

> has produced no credible results and yet eats 69 billion a year.

It's a pile of ugly looking mess and eats half of computer's resources.

It's a horrible system that eats companies from the inside.

It eats their time, and, at least where it intersects with Hacker News, serves to out people you'll know never to work with professionally.

He eats meat, which has a vast footprint in terms of land, water and energy use. How minimal is a lifestyle that leads to irrevocable climate change?

Addictive foods are more dangerous to someone who has a snacking/forager mentality than someone who plans and eats fixed meals every day.

Their stuff works 95% of the time; they just aren't used to a world where "5% failure rate" means "silently and consistently eats any customer's file if their name has a in it" instead of just "has to be restarted every hour.

The fact that its basically "molded" to look like the real food we used to eat?The reality is that we long ago crossed the line into having a society that mostly eats absolutely garbage and artificial food.

It pains me to see so many people, who quite likely rely on emacs, Xcode with gcc, gnu coreutils, or an operating system that would've never been possible without the Free software movement, sit around and ridicule RMS because he eats toe jam or really, really likes parrots.

You can demand chips be sold at lowest prices without being fused down, but then the company eats its own market, becomes unprofitable, and goes out of business at worst - or, at best, doesn't make enough money to fund further r&d as much as they want, which again hurts you, the consumer.

As "software eats the world" and tech companies start trying to compete in "meat space" industries, it will be imperative for them to understand why things are done the way they are, and how fruitful progress can be made without creating unnecessary friction by simply ignoring settled expectations.