Disreputable used in a sentence

Disreputable in a sentence as an adjective

This isn't in any way to say it's a disreputable outlet.

Just like I wouldn't pick up a candy bar off the street and eat it, I wouldn't download a disreputable looking app. Common sense.

I'm gonna file this site under "disreputable". Gems from the article: > "Most of those who have disappeared are children ages 20 months to 12 years and the elderly ages 74 to 85.

You should be ashamed for attempting to profit from such a thoroughly disreputable con. > Folks are right to be skeptical -- a lot of businesses have done this, tried to hide the fact there would be future charges.

I don't think we would want to use the disreputable behavior of nations in the past as a model for what is acceptable today. That's why treaties and agreements are made so that we learn from our mistakes.

And again, if you already said "yeah" to "run this bizarro app from disreputable source", are you going to say "omfg no" when asked if it can use the network?

If the FDA thinks of you as disreputable or a cowboy, they will inspect the **** out of you and issue Form 483s [0] till the cows come home. And that's not even including the PR impact and the market sell-off should you ever actually have a TGN 1412 incident[1].

In addition, the exchange shown with Zee where, caught in a lie, he threatens you by saying he will punish you by "staying well clear of anything ur involved with in future", shows that he is a disreputable person. Thank you for warning us about this site.

This would have the potential to drive disreputable shops out of business and promote those that care a bit more about basic human rights. It would be a daunting education and development task, but one that would be meaningful.

Edit: I often let my cynical side overrule me - and happily claim "they" will always continue doing shady and disreputable things. But the reason "they" can is that "we" do not stand up and shout loudly enough and so build the laws to prevent them.

Because of course everything _else_ Anonymous has done is totally legal, above board, and not at all disreputable.

Such statements are really just political manoeuvrings of a disreputable kind. In the UK universal health care has been viable since the NHS was founded over half a century ago.

If applied to a person: trash usually refers to someone that's disreputable in some grievous way, waste would refer to some that squandered some talent or resources. Junk wouldn't usually apply to a person but junkie means a drug addict.

They are not doing this secretly, consumed by fear and guilt, manufacturing these devices in the backroom of some disreputable bar in the nasty part of town and then furtively selling them from a van in a back alley, living in constant dread of exposure. They do this quite openly.

I'm loathe to be so negative on a "Show HN" post, but I strongly believe that this business is disreputable and that businesses of this type cause harm to the Internet. There may be value in finding blogs/bloggers matching specific queries; perhaps take email addresses out of the equation?

But of course disreputable "news" sites bring in a UFO enthusiast as their source for a quote about the possibility that there is intelligent life below the surface.

Often you do a fantastic job and are let go at the end of the 90 days because 90% of the time this scheme is how disreputable companies hire contractors for 90 day stints while paying low rates with no benefits. Now sure, this guy is the rare 10% that is completely honest and pure, I will assume that and he has no ill motive at all.

It's not an ad hominem to suggest that a piece of unconventional research is unlikely to be correct because it is published in a disreputable journal. Academia is all about reputation, and the standing of various journals.

It would seem axiomatic, that this is an untenable situation; that once this state obtains, it will not be long before the law becomes a disreputable joke, a sad reminder of former greatness, and a jungle in which everyone is a predator and fears becoming prey. That is why the reform of our justice system is such an urgent matter.

The proliferation of weapons is one thing, but the fact that these tragedies occur and we don't have a way to follow the chain back to the disreputable dealer who sold these armaments - and shut them down - is just non-sensical. The 2nd amendment fundamentalists who don't even want question how these weapons can get in the wrong hands - often use that same strawman you pose above - which is rediculous - many folks support the 2nd amendment yet find the need for further action to prevent these events from happening.