dicots

Sometimes when it didn't seem to give a high accurate match it says 'dicots' for the family.

Evolving to a partially carnivorous diet in plants is a very rare event even among dicots.

You know, I never considered that almost all plants we eat are angiosperms (flowering plants, monocots + dicots).

Cabbage is a dicot but not a tree - not all dicots are trees.

Many dicots use wind pollination, but most of the ones that make fruit we can eat are insect-pollinated.

Years ago they were classified as dicots, but they made that group polyphyletic.

How do you call all the short-lived, green dicots growing in the meadows?

Maybe you misinterpreted my parent comment as me suggesting all dicots were trees?

Describing this plant as a mix of a pine and an apple is a particularly poor choice having in mind that this is a monocot, thus neither directly related with coniferes nor with dicots.

Many dicots are wind-pollinated, including a lot of temperate zone trees, but the familiar useful ones are, generalising wildly, insect-pollinated.

(Monocots and Dicots split ~140-150 Myr ago [0], Arthropoda and Chordata about ~1000 Myr ago [1]) (I initially thought the Monocots/Dicots split was further back...

It will kill any dicots you grow in that manure.

It's always dicots." Too often, pointing Seek at a plant results in "dicots", which is about half the flowering plants out there.

My wife and I have a running joke about the Seek app: "Dicots.

"Dicots" is not a category with any significance.

Dicots are a sub-domain of angiosperms (flowering plants).