deliverer

HN isn't all that huge a traffic deliverer. It's just about the quality of that traffic.

> HN isn't all that huge a traffic deliverer. It's just about the quality of that traffic.

That's an idea, but it sounds like the risk to the deliverer of doing that in Rio de Janeiro is quite high.

If you were the deliverer in the college group or project then you will have the same thing in the workplace. Usually people who don't want to be doing it at the time, they might be good but uninterested.

A friend of mine interviewed for a van-deliverer job very many years ago. He would put a bicycle into the van, drive the van to the customer, ride the bike back to the depot and pick the next van and repeat.

For those who don't know: a Abstellvertrag handles the actions that need to be taken by the deliverer if nobody is home. For example, our postman delivers our packages at home into our garage.

So instead of a trained nurse feeding helpless patients, a gormless food deliverer drops a tray off at the patient and leaves. On paper they are still being fed, but in reality patients were starving during the trickiest few hours of recovery.

I absolutely agree that this only applies when you are the deliverer of bad news and should never be used as the receiver of bad news. Not wanting to hear problems is a terrible managerial style.

I don't really think much changes about journalism beyond opening it up to more people and changing the medium/deliverer of news.

If they leave the agreement solely between the deliverer and the recipient it should remove much of their liability risk. They could then reward people based upon positive reviews by recipients.

Remote development is starting to catch on and you usually can use whatever tack that makes you a great deliverer. So if you like Seaside, don't be shy an offer to use that power in doing something valuable to someone.

This sounds a lot like fiction, all these things happening, the shady deliverer, the globes, the dog/hjob thing, crawling out of the window when feeling haunted, finding his boss jking off and giving him his freepass. Anyway, this guy has to become an author.

They do not have permission to tell the delivery driver to cross the fucking street, or to talk to the deliverer's manager, or anything like that. They literally cannot actually solve my problem.

If it exceeds that limit, it becomes a regular rental and the deliverer is charged regularly. Also, it then becomes possible to add bonus incentives for getting the bike to the station faster.

What I would agree on is that in America there are more women doing grocery shopping which means your odds of having a women deliverer do better is good. However I'd argue that in this case Exec just provides a more thorough service hence the extra cost.

The easiest solution is to have a neutral location where the package can be securely placed by the distributor/deliverer, and retrieved by the user. Amazon Locker and other services provide this.

It is nowhere near the deliverer of hope you're making it out to be, it's an enabler of great negative paradigm shifts that is slowly starting to be recognised. Social media is starting to be recognised as a harm on society but slowly...

I worked for a paper in the 2000's, not as a deliverer, but their deliverer's were all independent contractors. These were two different papers at two different parts of the country, I'm sure not all papers handle it this way but I wouldn't be surprised if this was the case for most.

They don't give clear information to anyone and naturally create a hostile customer deliverer relationship that they can more easily profit on

One-breath pause <bad news here>" has always worked better for me, as both the deliverer and the recipient, than "Hey, <bad news>." Basically what I'm saying is that you could definitely read into these suggested phrases, as you have; but they play out way differently in a real-life conversation.

It's shared with the deliverer but as long as you're using SSL it should be just as secure. Speaking of which, the right way to do this is to validate their SSL client certificate, but I doubt many places are easily setup to do that - in fact I would bet the sending endpoint doesn't even use a certificate most of the time.

Understanding tone, context and audience, both as a deliverer and receiver of information, is not just for providing customer service. It's amazingly useful for simply getting along with other human beings.

The negative implications from the message deliverer come from you, not me. You are probably correct about him being an idiot, but the phrase being translated specifies that the message delivered is not relevant to the message, in the same way that I would not call a clock an idiot for being low on battery power.

The trick isn't 'just make it work with javascript off', it's 'deliverer something in the timeframe and on budget with the resources available' and those are different every time you embark on something.

Ts'o's argument is that yes: in this case, it is the responsibility of the deliverer of such information to try and eliminate the receiver's own misdefinition, and that the absence of such an attempt is deceptive.

Well, they're showing Magic being used for a lot of delivery services where the deliverer will expect a tip, so it seems like there is a hidden fee in the same sense... Unless they're working out something with the provider where the third party will not expect a tip, which would be a miracle.